I would love to listen to a debate someday between Duncan Watts and Malcolm Gladwell. Because, in his BIF-7 story, Duncan came across very much as an anti-Gladwell: precise, deliberate, and respectful of the difficulties and complexities involved with attempts to influence and predict behavior.
During his BIF-7 talk, Duncan talked about the problem of obviousness and common sense -- basically, that "the way we make sense of the world can actually prevent us from understanding it." This is also the hypothesis Duncan delineates in his new book, Everything Is Obvious: *Once You Know the Answer.
As Duncan elaborated, we are susceptible to errors of reasoning when we rely on common sense:
http://research.yahoo.com/Duncan_Watts
BIF Profile Page
http://businessinnovationfactory.com/iss/innovators/duncan-watts
This is part of my 31 (More) Days of #BIF7 blog series.
During his BIF-7 talk, Duncan talked about the problem of obviousness and common sense -- basically, that "the way we make sense of the world can actually prevent us from understanding it." This is also the hypothesis Duncan delineates in his new book, Everything Is Obvious: *Once You Know the Answer.
As Duncan elaborated, we are susceptible to errors of reasoning when we rely on common sense:
- When we think about why people do what they do, we place too much emphasis on incentives, motivations, and beliefs, and not enough on the thousands of other influencing factors
- Groups are extremely complicated to predict -- we erroneously apply the logic of "individual" action to groups
- We learn much less from history than we think and are prone to make the same mistakes over and over
http://research.yahoo.com/Duncan_Watts
BIF Profile Page
http://businessinnovationfactory.com/iss/innovators/duncan-watts
This is part of my 31 (More) Days of #BIF7 blog series.
Comments
Post a Comment